Legal Opinion

State v. Barr

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 2004No. 03 CO 44PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeGenaro, Judge.

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, the parties’ briefs, and their oral arguments before this court. Appellant Andy Barr appeals from the decision of the Columbiana Court of Common Pleas upholding his conviction of fleeing and eluding in violation of R.C. 2921.331(B), a fourth-degree felony. Although more were raised, the issues we must resolve are (1) whether venue was proven beyond a reasonable doubt despite the fact that no express evidence of venue was provided and (2) whether trial counsel was ineffective for allegedly…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. Smith, 06 Be 22 (4-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. Lahmann, Ca2006-03-058 (4-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. Rankin, Unpublished Decision (11-12-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. BruceOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. GonzalezOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API