Legal Opinion

State v. Hamblin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1988No. 86-1846PublishedCited by 438 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

Our first task in a death penalty case is to consider the claims of error by appellant. Second, we must independently weigh the aggravating circumstances in this case against any factors which mitigate against the imposition of the death penalty. Finally, we must independently decide whether appellant’s sentence is disproportionate to the penalty in similar cases. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the sentence of death.

I

At trial, the prosecution played portions of the tape-recorded interrogations of the appellant. Appellant asserts that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by438 opinions

  1. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. SchaimOhio Supreme Court · 1992

433 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API