State v. Phillips
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
Appellant has raised thirty propositions of law for our consideration. We have thoroughly reviewed each and, for the reasons which *77follow, find that none warrants a reversal of appellant’s convictions. In addition, we have independently reviewed the record, weighed the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors, and examined the proportionality of the death sentence in this case to the penalty imposed in similar cases. Upon a complete review of the record, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences.
I
Evidentiary Issues
A
In his first proposition of law, appellant raises several…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by518 opinions
- Bradshaw v. RicheySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
513 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.