People v. Ford
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
A jury charge which, despite defendant’s request, fails to include as part of its instructions concerning circumstantial evidence that the circumstantial facts proved must exclude every hypothesis but guilt constitutes reversible error. In People v Ford, there should, therefore, be a reversal and a new trial ordered. In People v Ladson, however, there should be an affirmance, the errors argued having either not been preserved or being within the Trial Judge’s discretion and unreviewable.
I
Perry Dillard testified that in the early morning hours of July 31, 1980,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. BenzingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by318 opinions
- People v. DelamotaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. DaddonaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. NormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. CabassaNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
313 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.