Legal Opinion

People v. Ford

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1985PublishedCited by 318 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Meyer, J.

A jury charge which, despite defendant’s request, fails to include as part of its instructions concerning circumstantial evidence that the circumstantial facts proved must exclude every hypothesis but guilt constitutes reversible error. In People v Ford, there should, therefore, be a reversal and a new trial ordered. In People v Ladson, however, there should be an affirmance, the errors argued having either not been preserved or being within the Trial Judge’s discretion and unreviewable.

I

Perry Dillard testified that in the early morning hours of July 31, 1980,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. BenzingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by318 opinions

  1. People v. DelamotaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. DaddonaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. NormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. CabassaNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

313 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API