People v. Hughes
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Wachtler, J.
The primary question on this appeal concerns the admissibility of a rape victim’s testimony when she has undergone hypnosis sometime prior to trial for the purpose of refreshing or restoring her memory of the incident. The trial court held that the pretrial use of hypnosis did not affect the admissibility of the victim’s testimony but only presented a credibility question for the jury. The Appellate Division reversed and ordered a new trial. The court held that hypnosis has not been generally accepted in the scientific community as a reliable method of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. AllweissNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.