In the Matter of Petition of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The question we address in this administrative appeal is whether an electric utility may petition to provide service outside its statutorily assigned service territory to a “large load” customer in another utility’s assigned service area. We conclude that SDCL 49-34A-56 allows only customers to petition for an outside provider. Thus, we affirm the Public Utilities Commission’s ruling that an outside provider lacked standing to bring a petition under the statute.
Background
[¶ 2.] The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) regulates which utility provides a customer with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Storey v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Esling v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Town Square Limited Partnership v. Clay County Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leonard v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Real Estate CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Heinemeyer v. Heartland Consumers Power DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Heinemeyer v. Heartland Consumers Power DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008