Legal Opinion

Heinemeyer v. Heartland Consumers Power District

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2008No. 24717PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] Heartland Consumers Power District (Heartland) appeals from an order and writ of mandamus finding that Jeffrey Ray Heinemeyer (Heinemeyer) was legally qualified to serve on the Heartland Consumers Power District Board of Directors (the Board) and requiring the Board to seat Heinemeyer on the Board. We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

[¶ 2.] Heartland is a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of South Dakota, with headquarters in Madison, South Dakota. Heartland is organized pursuant to the Consumers Power District Law, SDCL chs.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Block v. DrakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Sorrels v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heinemeyer v. Heartland Consumers Power DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API