Legal Opinion

Maas v. Department of Commerce & Regulation

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Lauw Marcus Maas appeals from a one-year revocation of his drivers license by the Department of Commerce and Regulation (Department). The Department revoked his license because of a second offense DUI conviction. Maas argues that the Department, and the circuit court on appeal, applied the wrong look-back window in which prior DUI convictions can be considered to extend the length of a revocation. We affirm the Department’s revocation under SDCL 32-12-52.1, and its use of the ten-year look-back window in SDCL 32-23^.1.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] Maas was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watertown Coop. Elevator Ass'n v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Arends v. Dacotah CementSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re the Revocation of the Driver License of FischerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. West Central Education Ass'n v. West Central School District 49-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal From Decision of Yankton County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re the Adoption of H.L.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hay v. Board of Com'rs for Grant CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jans v. Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Hay v. Board of Com'rs for Grant CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API