Legal Opinion

Bridges v. Banner Health

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2008No. S-12559PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court enjoined Alaska Open Imaging Center (AOIC) from operating its Fairbanks magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) facility without first obtaining a certificate of need (CON). Six weeks after the superior court issued the injunction enjoining AOIC, AOIC's medical director, Dr. Robert Bridges, unsuccessfully moved to intervene in the superior court proceeding. Dr. Bridges appeals the denial of his intervention motion and AOIC appeals the injunction. Because the superior court did not err in determining that Dr. Bridges's intervention motion was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Joseph Foster v. Albert Gueory, Ronald Dorsey, and Rudolph J. Thornton v. Local 2311 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Wetherhorn v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Banco Popular De Puerto Rico v. David Greenblatt, the Official Secured Creditors' Committee of Amfesco Industries, Inc., Etc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. PEBBLE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. ParnellAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Alsworth v. SeybertAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Chilkoot Lumber Co. v. Rainbow Glacier Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Pederson v. Arctic Slope Regional CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Price v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API