PEBBLE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. Parnell
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court ruled that a proposed initiative relating to the regulation of large scale metallic mineral mines was constitutionally and statutorily permissible and could appear on the ballot. The parties challenging the initiative appealed that ruling, asserting that the initiative (1) would violate the constitutional prohibition against initiatives that would appropriate public assets, (2) would enact constitutionally impermissible special legislation, and (8) is invalid because its summary and cost statements are defective. Shortly after oral…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Katzenbach v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gaines v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Jones v. Bowie Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Alliance of Concerned Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving IvyAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.