Legal Opinion

Alsworth v. Seybert

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2014No. 6900 S-14978PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A group of citizens sued two borough assembly members, alleging various violations of borough and state conflict of interest laws and the common law conflict of interest doe-trine. After the borough took official action facilitating the assembly members' defense, the citizens moved to enjoin the assembly members from using their official positions to defend the lawsuit or pursue personal financial gain. The superior court granted a preliminary injunction under the balance of hardships standard, concluding that the citizens faced the possibility of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lake & Peninsula Borough Assembly v. OberlatzAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Seybert v. AlsworthAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State of Alaska, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Division of Elections, and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacity v. Alyse S. GalvinAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. SBRMCOA, LLC v. Morehouse Real Estate Investments, LLCSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  5. Richard R. Watkinson v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API