Legal Opinion

Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Apokedak

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1980No. 4464PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

In 1973, the Alaska legislature passed an act authorizing a commission to regulate entry into the commercial fisheries for all fishery resources in the state (hereinafter Limited Entry Act).1 The Act specified that after January 1, 1974, “no person may operate gear in the commercial taking of fishery resources without a valid entry permit or a valid interim-use permit issued by the commission.”2 Only persons who had harvested fishery resources commercially while participating in the fisheries as holders of gear licenses are eligible to apply for entry permits.3

Apokeda…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. State v. OstroskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Departments of Transportation & Labor v. Enserch Alaska Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. AnthonyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API