Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Murray v. Pure Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1934No. 24799PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjsby, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Creek county on the '28th day of May, 1932, by the state of Oklahoma on relation of William H. Murray, Governor, as plaintiff, for the use and benefit of the Sapulpa State Bank, an insolvent banking institution, and the depositors and other creditors thereof, against the Pure Oil Company, a corporation, Royalties Corporation of America, a corporation, John G. Ellinghausen, E. A. Ellinghausen, First National Bank of Tulsa, Okla., Sapulpa State Bank, and H. L. Payne, as defendants.

The petition of the plaintiff is lengthy and sets forth many…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Haskell v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. State Ex Rel. Short v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Bynum v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LenahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I. O. O. F.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Johnson v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Dawson v. DinwiddieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Moore v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API