Legal Opinion

Moore v. Brett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1943No. 30581PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an appeal from an order of forfeiture of 30 slot machines and the money, amounting to $780.60, contained therein, entered in a proceeding brought by the county attorney of Carter county under 21 O. S. 1941 § 973. The machines were seized while being operated in connection with a carnival at Ardmore. There is no contention that they are not gambling devices as defined in 21 O. S. 1941 §§ 964, 972, and as prohibited by 21 O. S. 1941 § 970.

The owner, Madge Moore, appellant here, makes three contentions: (1) That the action not being brought in the name of the state, there was no proper…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Keeter v. State Ex Rel. Saye, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. State Ex Rel. v. Cobb, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Fairmount Engine Co. v. Montgomery CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Dorrell v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Reeves v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Replogle v. Joyland ClubMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State ex rel. Turpen v. A 1977 Chevrolet Pickup Truck, VIN CC 1447S187406, Bearing Oklahoma License Number T 148-890Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API