Legal Opinion
Sterling v. Constantin
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 12, 1932No. 11 and 453PublishedCited by 367 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
The District Court, composed of three judges (U. S. C., Tit. 28, §380), granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the appellants, Ross S. Sterling, Governor of the State of Texas, W. W. Sterling, Adjutant General of the State, and Jacob F. Wolters, Brigadier General of the Texas National Guard, from enforcing their military or executive orders regulating or restricting the production of oil from complainants’ wells and from interfering in any manner “ with the lawful production of oil from complainants’ property.” 57 F. (2d) 227. By stipulation, .causes of action set forth in the…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by367 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
362 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.