Legal Opinion

Yates v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 6, 1977No. 1 CA-IC 1643PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Chief Judge.

The issue presented on this review of an award of the Industrial Commission is whether petitioner sustained her burden of proving a compensable workmen’s compensation claim when she presented evidence only that an industrial incident occurred, but not that the event resulted in any temporary or permanent disability or that the alleged injury necessitated any medical treatment. We agree with the decision of the hearing officer that in establishing nothing more than that an incident occurred at work, petitioner failed to establish all the necessary elements of her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waller v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lowry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Emery v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Eldorado Insurance Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Lamb v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Western Bonded Products v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Special Fund of the Industrial Commission v. Catalina Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Noble v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API