Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 18, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1460PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*700OPINION

PROEB, Judge.

On March 4,1974, petitioner, Edna Lamb, sustained an injury to her back while moving a bed during the performance of her duties as a maid at Francisco Grande Motor Hotel. Petitioner’s claim was accepted by respondent insurance carrier and benefits were paid to her from the date of injury to February 27, 1975, when a Notice of Claim Status was issued terminating benefits on the basis that her condition was stationary with no permanent disability. Petitioner protested this notice and two formal hearings were then convened, after which the hearing officer found and affirmed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bedwell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Paulley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Arellano v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Montgomery v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Western Bonded Products v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Yates v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Ohlmaier v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. Rivera v. terros/copperpointCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API