Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
*207OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
This is an appeal of an award finding a compensable claim for a gradual loss of hearing. The main issue in this review is whether an admission by the claimant that he knew more than one year prior to filing a claim that he suffered a hearing loss and that the loss wás the result of noise levels at his employment bars his claim under A.R.S. § 23-1061(A). Collateral issues deal with the burden of proof under A.R.S. § 23-908(D) and whether the claimant in any event suffered a compensable injury.
The claimant, Isidoro Verdugo, has worked for Pacific Fruit since 1948 except…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Yates v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Emery v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- M. M. Sundt Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987