Legal Opinion

Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 28, 1986No. 1 CA-IC 3372PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*207OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

This is an appeal of an award finding a compensable claim for a gradual loss of hearing. The main issue in this review is whether an admission by the claimant that he knew more than one year prior to filing a claim that he suffered a hearing loss and that the loss wás the result of noise levels at his employment bars his claim under A.R.S. § 23-1061(A). Collateral issues deal with the burden of proof under A.R.S. § 23-908(D) and whether the claimant in any event suffered a compensable injury.

The claimant, Isidoro Verdugo, has worked for Pacific Fruit since 1948 except…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Yates v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Emery v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. M. M. Sundt Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API