Western Bonded Products v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Judge.
The sole issue in this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission is whether the administrative law judge erred in inferring from lay testimony that claimant’s back injury was causally related to an incident which occurred during his employment.
Claimant filed a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits on May 6,1980 alleging that he was injured on March 3, 1980 while unloading a truck for his employer. The carrier denied the claim by notice of claim status stating that there was insufficient evidence to establish a compensable claim. Hearings were thereafter…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Caekos v. Stanley Fruit Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Yates v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Bilbrey v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Eldorado Insurance Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Gutierrez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Aguayo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.