Legal Opinion

Application of Jean P. Rosselet, Oldrich K. Sebek and George B. Spero

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 1, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7334PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of product claims 3 and 5 in application serial No. 701,967, filed December 11, 1957, for “Organic Compounds and Process.” No claims have been allowed.

The invention relates to steroid compounds and, according to the application, is “particularly concerned with 6-methyl-16a-hydroxyhydrocortisone, l-dehydro-6methyl-16a-hydroxyhydroeortisone, 6-methyl - 9a - fluoro - 16a - hydroxyhydrocortisone, l-dehydro-6-methyl-9a-fluoro16a-hydroxyhydrocortisone, the 16, 21-diesters thereof,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of Joseph R. Riden, Jr., and James P. FlavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re KellerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  2. Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. Application of Sigurd I. LindellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Application of Carl D. LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. In re GyurikCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API