Legal Opinion
Application of Craige
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 26, 1951No. Patent Appeal 5788PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting claims 8, 9, 10, and 13 to 18 inclusive, in appellant’s application, serial No. 592,729, for patent on alleged new and useful improvements in “Anthelmintic Compositions.” No claim was allowed.
Claims 9, 10, 14, and 17 were rejected as being drawn to non-elected species and, therefore, need not be considered here on their merits. In re Vincent, 159 F.2d 877, 34 C.C.P.A., Patents, 936.
The application relates to a new class of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In Re ThuauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- Application of BennerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- In re CarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- In Re SaundersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Application of Joseph R. Riden, Jr., and James P. FlavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re HackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of Alan J. Lemin, Arnolds Steinhards and Gerald A. BoyackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Carlo v. Bocciarelli v. Charles E. HuffmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.