Legal Opinion

American Motorists Insurance v. Gould

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 6, 1990No. 13643PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

The plaintiff American Motorists Insurance Company brought this application to vacate an arbitration award made to the defendant Karen Gould, pursuant to the compulsory arbitration provision of General Statutes § 38-175c (a) (l)1 and based upon the *627uninsured motorist coverage afforded by the automobile liability policy issued by the plaintiff. The trial court denied the application, rendering judgment for the defendant. In its appeal the plaintiff insurer raises two questions involving the construction of § 38-175c, our uninsured motorist coverage statute, and of the uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Dewberry v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Jones Destruction, Inc. v. UpjohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Connolly v. Royal Globe InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Covenant Insurance v. CoonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Ceci v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Stephan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Rydingsword v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API