Legal Opinion

McKinley v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1980No. 53038PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Presiding Judge:

The issue here is whether the amendment to Title 36 O.S. § 3636(C), effective March 16, 1976, that changed the definition of an “uninsured motorist,” is applicable to the uninsured motorist provisions of a pre-ex-isting automobile insurance contract.

Title 36 O.S. § 3636(C), prior to the 1976 amendment, provided for uninsured motorist coverage but not underinsured motorist coverage. Simmons v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Okl., 543 P.2d 1384 (1975). The 1976 amendment thereto expanded the definition of an uninsured motorist to include the situation where an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Tom P. McDermott, Inc. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Cavett v. Geary Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Layton v. Pan American Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Stuart v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Eakle v. Grinnell Corp.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Opinion No. (1996), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1996
  5. Opinion No. (1997), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API