Legal Opinion

Eakle v. Grinnell Corp.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 2003No. CIV-02-568-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SEAY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Jimmy D. EaHe (“EaMe”) brings this declaratory judgment action against Defendant Grinnell Corporation (“Grinnell”) seeMng to have the court declare the parties’ Non-Compete Agreement (“NCA”) invalid and unenforceable under OMahoma law. The parties have filed their respective motions for summary judgment and the matter is ripe for determination. Having fully reviewed the respective submissions, the court concludes the NCA is valid and enforceable; consequently, EaMe’s motion for summary judgment should be denied and Grinnell’s motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Moore v. Subaru of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. Williams v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Herrington v. HacklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Freeling v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Howard v. Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Ricky D. Parker and James Myers v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API