Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided May 6, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representative Pope,

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question:

Do the provisions of 52 O.S.Supp. 1995, § 570.10[52-570.10], whichamend the remittance requirements for the payment of proceedsfrom the sale of oil and gas, render differing provisions inexisting leases or contracts null and void?

¶ 1 Section 570.10 of Title 52 is a portion of the Production Revenue Standards Act, codified as 52 O.S.Supp. 1995, §§ 570.1[52-570.1] to 570.15, which sets out requirements and duties of well operators concerning the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Quinlan v. Koch Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass'n v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Tom P. McDermott, Inc. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. McKinley v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API