Legal Opinion

Kammerer v. United Parcel Service

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 23, 1995No. 93-05996; CA A84768PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that held that an injury to her eye was not compensable. The issue is whether the Board erred in its determination that claimant’s injury, which was caused by horseplay, did not arise out of her employment. We reverse and remand.

The facts are not in dispute. Claimant was required by her employer to park her car in a lot across the street from employer’s main facility. In order to reach her car at the end of her shift, she had to walk past a guard shack and through a parking lot reserved for certain employees.

On March 19,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stark v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Henderson v. S.D. Deacon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Kessen v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Davis v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. SAIF Corp. v. FortsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Stan v. Constitution State Service Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Torkko v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API