Legal Opinion
Torkko v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 30, 1997No. Agency No. 95-01511; CA A91855Published
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that concluded that her injury was not compensable because it did not arise out of her employment. ORS 656.005(7)(a). We reverse and remand.
We quote the material facts, which are undisputed, from the Board’s order:
“Claimant is an elementary school teacher who teaches seven!-] and eight-year-olds a variety of subjects on a daily basis. On December 6, 1994, which was a regularly-scheduled work day, claimant drove to her elementary school and entered a parking lot owned and maintained by the school district. The parking lot is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- SAIF Corp. v. MarinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Kammerer v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995