Henderson v. S.D. Deacon Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that her injury was not compensable. The issue is whether the relationship between claimant’s injury and her employment is sufficient to conclude that the injury was work-connected and, therefore, compensable. We reverse.
The facts are not disputed. Claimant worked on the fourth floor of an office building that is leased by employer. There are no lunch facilities on the fourth floor. Employer required claimant to take a one hour unpaid lunch break, and her supervisor encouraged her to leave the building during that time. When…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phil A. Livesley Co. v. RussOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Cope v. West American InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Philpott v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kaiel v. NCE Cultural Homestay InstituteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- SAIF Corp. v. MarinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Compton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Kammerer v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Bruntz-Ferguson v. Liberty Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.