Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Fortson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1998No. 96-01843; CA A99413PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board in which the Board found that claimant’s injury arose out of and in the course of claimant’s employment and, therefore, was compensable. We review for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a), and affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Claimant is a long-term production and maintenance worker at employer’s paper production facility. At the time of his injury, claimant’s working title was power and recovery lead operator and his principal duty was to keep equipment running properly in the recovery boiler area. In addition to his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phil A. Livesley Co. v. RussOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Andrews v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SAIF v. SumnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. v. FrazerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Mendoza v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API