Legal Opinion
Simms v. Bovee
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 1949No. 846PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Appellee Bovee brought suit in the Small •Claims and Conciliation Branch of Municipal Court for return of a deposit on a contract for the purchase of an automobile from Simms Motor Company. Bovee was awarded $50 and the motor company filed with us an application for appeal, which we granted.1
We have had to ascertain what the evidence was by recourse to (a) the facts stated in the application for appeal, (b) a certificate of the trial judge filed under our Rule 30 reciting that “the facts, issues, and rulings are sufficiently and correctly .set forth in the application, as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell v. LammonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- Davy v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Barnette v. SayersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- In Re Oscar Nebel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Tomboy Gold & Copper Co. v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Order of Ahepa v. Travel Consultants, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Berg v. SlaffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Brodsky v. LinderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955