Legal Opinion

Oppel v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 7, 1964No. [App. No. 34, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an application for leave to appeal from an order of Chief Judge Manley in redetermination proceedings that the applicant is still a defective delinquent. The applicant seeks leave to appeal on the grounds: (1) that there was no evidence legally sufficient to support a finding of defective delinquency; (2) that the determination by the trial court was clearly erroneous in that it was against the weight of the evidence; (3) that this evidence indicated that the applicant was prepared to leave Patuxent Institution and re-enter society; and (4) that Code (1957) Article 31B is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. McCloskey v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Dickerson v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Jewell v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Mills v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alt v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Murel v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Johns v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Chavez v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Moulsdale v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API