Legal Opinion

Moulsdale v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 2, 1965No. App. No. 3PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, J.

This is an application for leave to appeal from an order of Judge Foster in redetermination proceedings that the applicant was still a defective delinquent. The applicant through his court-appointed counsel seeks leave to appeal on the grounds: (1) that the verdict of the lower court was erroneous and against the weight of the evidence; (2) that the lower court erred because there was no evidence legally sufficient to support its finding that it was not reasonably safe for society to *415terminate the applicant’s confinement; and (3) that the trial court admitted into evidence hearsay testimony,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pierson v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Oppel v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wise v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API