Mills v. Director of Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.
In this application for leave to appeal from a finding of defective delinquency, the petitioner raises eleven contentions, all of a general nature, which may be summarized as follows:
1. Denial of due process and equal protection of the laws;
2. Double Jeopardy;
3. The statute operates as an ex post facto law;
4. The statute imposes cruel and unusual punishment because (a) the penalty is unlimited and (b) it authorizes psychiatric experimentation on human guinea pigs;
5. The statute violates the rule against self-incrimination by authorizing (a) the use of psychiatric records and interviews and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Bullock v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Simmons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- McDonough v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simon v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Oppel v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964