Legal Opinion
Jewell v. Director
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 16, 1964No. [App. No. 62, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
236 Md. 643 (1964)
204 A.2d 564
JEWELL
v.
DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
[App. No. 62, September Term, 1964.]
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided November 16, 1964.
Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, HORNEY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.
2Per curiam
This is the third time that the applicant has been found to be a defective delinquent, but the first time he has applied for leave to appeal. The record contains evidence to support the determination of defective delinquency. It is well settled that the testimony of Dr. Boslow is admissible, although based in part upon the medical findings of others. Dickerson v.…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Dickerson v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Woodson Apartments, Inc. v. DenickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
4Cited by2 opinions
- Oppel v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Hirons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964