Legal Opinion
Litvin v. Engesether
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 7, 1984No. 39-554; CA A21444; 39-966; CA A21143PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.
This is a consolidated appeal of two actions, one by plaintiffs Litvin (the Litvins) for specific performance of a land sale contract, which we review de novo, and the other by plaintiff Maring & Associates (Maring) to recover a real estate broker’s commission on the sale to the Litvins, which we review for errors of law. The two cases were also consolidated for trial to the court.
The trial court advised the parties by letter dated February 27, 1981, that it found that the Litvins and defendant Engesether had entered into a binding contract on or about August 18,1978, for the purchase and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Caveny v. ASHEIMOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Booras v. UyedaOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Van DykeOregon Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Salem Ex Rel. Nuequitable Leasing Co. v. Clearwater Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Becker v. DeLeoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Co. v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Wedemeyer v. Nike Ihm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.