Legal Opinion

Booras v. Uyeda

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1983No. CA 18375, SC 28634, 28663PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of an earnest money agreement which provided for later execution of a land sale installment contract. We hold that if the buyer seeks to avoid the contractual indefiniteness which would prevent specific performance of the contract on an installment basis by paying the entire balance in cash, the buyer must allege, in the complaint, facts showing why such relief is appropriate and a prayer for such relief. The failure to do so bars specific performance in this case.

Plaintiff Booras sued defendants Uyeda and Fenwick for specific performance of a contract…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United Rs. & Elec. Co. of Baltimore v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Bakker v. Baza'r, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Marvin Wood Products v. CallowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Genest v. John Glenn CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Oregon Rsa No. 6, Inc. v. Castle Rock Cellular of Oregon Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
  5. Povey v. ClowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API