Estate of Cochrane
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
It appears that by the agreement in 1940 Cochrane promised and agreed to transfer to Miss Kurz, by his will, all the right, title, and interest which Cochrane may have at the time of his death in and to all property real, personal, or mixed, and, by his actual last will and testament, he breached the agreement.
Appellant now does not urge several propositions which he presented to the trial court. We will pass only on the contentions which he submits here.
His first proposition is that in 1936 Cochrane and Miss Kurz made a contract partly for the benefit of a third party, Alexander MacKenzie,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Murtha v. DonohooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Dilger v. Estate of McQuadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Frieders v. Estate of FriedersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Kelly v. BowenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schroeder v. Estate of VossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Bornfleth v. HoeppnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Diamondback Funding, LLC v. Chili's of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Dwyer v. Climatrol Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
- Bornfleth v. HoeppnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.