Legal Opinion

Dwyer v. Climatrol Industries, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 6, 1975No. 73-C-201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION and ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The defendants have moved for summary judgment. The plaintiffs have moved to add Fedders Corporation as a party defendant and also to have a preliminary determination of law regarding the “doctrine of virtual representation.” In view of my finding that the motions for summary judgment submitted by the defendants must be granted, there is no occasion for my resolving the plaintiffs’ applications.

The nature of this action was considered by the court in a memorandum dated February 4, 1975, at which time the court considered the motion for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works of International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  4. Estate of CochraneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Thornbery v. MGS Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raymond Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corporation, Raymond Mahoney v. Great Northern Industries, Inc., Atlas Tack CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. Arthur Dwyer v. Climatrol Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API