Legal Opinion

Bornfleth v. Hoeppner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1966Published

1Opinion of the Court

32 Wis.2d 339 (1966)

ESTATE OF HOEPPNER: BORNFLETH and others, Appellants,

v.

HOEPPNER, Executor, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 3, 1966.

November 1, 1966.

For the appellants Arthur and Harry Bornfleth there were briefs by Lowry Hunter & Tikalsky, and oral argument by Thomas E. Anderson, all of Waukesha.

Thomas S. Brenner of Waukesha, guardian ad litem for the appellant John Hoeppner, joined in certain of the arguments in the briefs of appellants Bornfleth and the respondent, and also argued.

For the respondent there was a brief by Bertram & Bertram of Milwaukee, and oral argument by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Doyle v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Schley v. Estate of SchleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Pederson v. First National Bank of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Chandler v. Estate of RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API