Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Estate of Voss

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1963PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Presented for our determination are the following issues:(1) Whether appellant was entitled to compensation for her services rendered.(2) Whether the measure and amount of compensation determined by the trial court was proper.(1) Recovery on Quantum Meruit.

On quantum meruit, a common count in the historical action of assumpsit, recovery is allowed for services performed for another on the basis of a contract implied in law or an implied promise to pay the performer for what the services were reasonably worth. Mead v. Ringling (1954), 266 Wis. 523, 528, 64 N. W. (2d) 222, 65 N. W. (2d) 35;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wojahn v. National Union Bank of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Schneck v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. DehartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Cross v. LeuenbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Mead v. RinglingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Glasstech, Inc. v. TGL Tempering Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  2. Seegers v. SpragueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sonkin & Melena Co., L.P.A. v. ZaranskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In Matter of Estate of SteffesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Beane v. City of Sturgeon BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API