Legal Opinion

Frieders v. Estate of Frieders

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 6, 1923:

Owen, J.

At the time of the injury to the plaintiff he and his employer, the deceased uncle, were concededly subject to the provisions of the workmen’s. compensation act. Immediately upon the injury, therefore, a liability was imposed by law upon the uncle, now deceased, to make compensation for such injuries according to the rates and schedules provided in that act. The amount of the liability thus imposed could have been quite easily and definitely determined. For the present purposes it is quite safe to1 say that it would not have exceeded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murtha v. DonohooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Dilger v. Estate of McQuadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ellis v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Ranney v. McLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Aragon v. BoydNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Keen v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Estate of CochraneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API