Legal Opinion

Mills v. Garlow

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1989No. 88-162PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

This is an accountant malpractice case. Appellants John Mills and Toni Mills filed suit against appellee William C. Garlow essentially alleging that appellee’s negligent advice regarding a property exchange resulted in increased tax liability for appellants. The district court granted summary judgment to appellee on the basis of the statute of limitations.

We reverse.

Appellants describe the issue as:

WHETHER OR NOT THE PARK COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS RELATING TO ACCOUNTING MALPRACTICE HAD RUN UPON THE PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM AGAINST…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Leonhart v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Isaacson, Stolper & Co. v. Artisan's Savings BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Davis v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Nowotny v. L & B Contract Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API