Legal Opinion

Leonhart v. Atkinson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 4, 1972No. [No. 278, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

This case is before us on appeal from a decision of the Superior Court of Baltimore City where Judge Sodaro granted a motion for summary judgment after concluding that this cause of action for professional malpractice was barred by the statute of limitations. Maryland Code (1957, 1972 Repl. Vol.), Art. 57, § 1. Consequently our primary task is to determine whether any factual issues exist. In doing so, we must resolve all inferences against the moving party as we examine the pleadings, admissions, and affidavits here. Maryland Rule 610; Sherman v. Am. Bankers Life Assur., 264 Md. 239, 285 A.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hahn v. ClaybrookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  3. Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Mumford v. Staton, Whaley & PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Mattingly v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API