Seattle Street Railway & Municipal Employees Relief Ass'n v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Employees
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
This action involves, primarily, the superior right to the use of certain descriptive names and certain component words thereof. Plaintiff, a corporation, sought by its complaint (1) to enjoin defendants from the use by them of the designated names or any names similar thereto, (2) to enjoin defendants from publicly asserting or representing that plaintiff was guilty of fraud in conducting its activities under such names, and (3) to recover damages sustained by reason of defendants’ alleged malicious assertions and representations concerning plaintiff, and by reason of defendants’ alleged…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eastern Outfitting Co. v. ManheimWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Diamond Drill Contracting Co. v. International Diamond Drill Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Martell v. St. Francis Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Olympia Brewing Co. v. Northwest Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Rosenburg v. Fremont Undertaking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Foss v. CulbertsonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Seattle Endeavors, Inc. v. MastroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Tradewell Stores, Inc. v. T. B. & M., Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Boice v. StevensonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Baldassano v. AccetturaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.