Legal Opinion

Seattle Endeavors, Inc. v. Mastro

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1994No. 60137-2PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Michael Mastro and Paul and Barbara Stephanus appeal a Court of Appeals decision reversing a judgment in their favor in an action brought by Carroll Du-val and Seattle Endeavors, Inc., to enjoin the infringement of a trade name. At issue is whether the Court of Appeals properly ruled that petitioners should be enjoined from making use of the name in question and whether the court properly awarded respondents attorney fees under the Consumer Protection Act. Respondents request an award of attorney fees for answering this petition.

The relevant facts are undisputed. In 1974, Carroll Duval bought…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nordstrom, Inc. v. TampourlosWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood BankWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Foss v. CulbertsonWashington Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lahoti v. Vericheck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Safeworks, LLC v. Teupen America, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
  3. Borish v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Borish v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Nat'l Prods., Inc. v. Arkon Res., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API