Legal Opinion
Olympia Brewing Co. v. Northwest Brewing Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 14, 1934No. 25154. Department TwoPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
A motion made for the first time in brief of respondent to strike the statement of facts because no abstract has been served or filed, as provided by statute and by Bule VI of the supreme court, is now denied as not well taken.
The statement of facts contains but 106 pages, including two pages of index and the certificate of the trial judge. The overplus in the statement of facts is so insubstantial as not to justify the granting of the motion, especially when made for the first time in the briefs. State ex rel. State Bank of Seattle v. Scott, 102 Wash. 510, 173 Pac. 498; Schirmer v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Schirmer v. NethercuttWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Diamond Drill Contracting Co. v. International Diamond Drill Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Rosenburg v. Fremont Undertaking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Wright Restaurant Co. v. Seattle Restaurant Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Foss v. CulbertsonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Consolidated Home Specialties Co. v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Seattle Street Railway & Municipal Employees Relief Ass'n v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street EmployeesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Cazier v. Economy Cash Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Boice v. StevensonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.