Legal Opinion

Baldassano v. Accettura

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 9, 1949No. Gen. No. 44,709PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kiley

This is an appeal by several defendants from an order granting an interlocutory injunction. Sec. 78 C. P. A.

The defendants’ motion to strike the complaint was effectually denied by entry of the order. The motion admitted the facts well pleaded. It admitted that plaintiffs ’ union has used the name United Shoe Service, Employees’ Union, Local 1143 since 1937; that it is an affiliate of the A. F. of L.; that it is composed of more than four hundred shoe repairing and rebuilding workers; that the Union has established a valuable reputation through negotiating collective bargaining contracts in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Committee of Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Investors Syndicate of America, Inc. v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Seattle Street Railway & Municipal Employees Relief Ass'n v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street EmployeesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Mossler v. JacobsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. Merchants' Detective Ass'n v. Detective Mercantile AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. MatualAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Scholz v. BarbeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  3. Weingart v. WeingartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  4. People Ex Rel. Brown v. Illinois State Troopers Lodge No. 41Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Capitol Records, Inc. v. Vee Jay Records, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API