Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1958No. Civ. 23211PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiff, city of Los Angeles, filed an action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County against defendant, The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a corporation, to recover the value of street occupancy. Its answer was filed and after plaintiff’s demand for a jury defendant noticed its motion for a change of place of trial under section 394, Code of Civil Procedure. Defendant sought a change of venue to either Alpine or Mono County where it claimed it does not do business. From the minute order denying the motion, defendant appeals.
Section 394, Code of Civil Procedure, reads in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Department of Motor Vehicles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. Centr-O-MartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Alford v. PiernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Steilberg v. LacknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Rushing v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.