Legal Opinion

Waterman v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1936No. L. A. 15949PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review the recommendation of the board of governors of The State Bar that .petitioner be suspended from the practice of the law in this state for the period of six months. After notice to show cause and two hearings thereon, local committee No. 3 found petitioner guilty of unprofessional conduct involving moral turpitude_ within the meaning of section 287, subdivision (5), of the Code of Civil Procedure and constituting a violation of rule 15 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, and recommended suspension for thirty days. The board of governors adopted the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Marsh v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Stephens v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bruns v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API