In Re Taylor
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Alleging that he is illegally confined and restrained of his liberty by the warden of Folsom prison, petitioner seeks by this application for a writ of habeas corpus to secure his release and discharge.
Petitioner was convicted in Los Angeles County on three counts of grand theft. He was received at San Quentin on August 18, 1928, and thereafter his term was fixed at four years for the first offense and two years for each two subsequent offenses, the sentences to run concurrently, so that his maximum sentence would be four years. With full allowance of credits on this term petitioner would be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Application of StantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re HeckmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- In Re MannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- In Re ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- In Re ShullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re MarzecCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.